As soon as they add C4D plugin I will buy it for sure. Impressed what I can see and hear so far about RS.
-- Micic Srecko ------------------- Mail: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Skype:srecko.micic ------------------- Portfolio: http://sreckom.webworkman.com/ On 5.1.2016. 15:54:12, Ed Manning <[email protected]> wrote: 2 years on Redshift. Saved my business, and made lighting/rendering fun again. You can put together an RS-based killer workstation for $2500 that outperforms $10K worth of VRay- or Arnold-based hardware. Only volume shading has been missing and it has that now, as well as a new PBR system that makes wonderful sense. And anyway, as an individual/small shop, the barrier to doing significant volumetric work is still the simulation/iteration time, not the render time, so I tend to avoid it. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ivan Vasiljevic <[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]> wrote: One lic here, but I would still give advantage to Arnold over RS. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Davidson <[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]> wrote: Every render I run, on Softimage is run through Redshift. I have been using Redshift since Beta, and am a very happy customer. No volumetrics, yet, though. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016, 7:32 AM Morten Bartholdy <[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]> wrote: Out of curiosity - how many of you have started using or completely switched to Redshift? Regards Morten -- Ivan Vasiljevic - Lighting TD Founder, Digital Asset Tailors - web: http://digitalassettailors.com/ [http://digitalassettailors.com/] email: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
