It wasn't supported up till now, I think they will be introducing it in the coming weeks.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:18 AM, James De Colling <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry for the potentially silly question, but how is redshift with > Rendermap? we use it extensively with MR, and would need redshift to have > the same capability > > James, > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Morten Bartholdy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Wow, it is quite impressive what an impact Redshift has made already. >> >> >> >> I have done a fair amount of testing with Redshift too and find on >> average scenes to be 5-10 times faster than Arnold with comparable quality, >> plus a number of things are simpler to set up the way you want it, in part >> because of the rapid feedback in the renderregion. I have yet to test it on >> really complex scenes, so that will be the next thing to check. I agree on >> a lack of shader support in certain parts, especially compared to >> Arnold/Sitoa, so it is reassuring that Burtnyk and Co are so responsive :) >> >> >> >> We will likely also incorporate it to some extent when it supports vdb >> and volumetric rendering and see where it takes us. >> >> >> >> >> >> Morten >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Den 5. januar 2016 kl. 19:50 skrev "Emilio Hernández" <[email protected]>: >> >> >> Softimage and Redshift. Best marriage ever! >> >> >> >> I have 4 licenses. >> >> >> >> > >
