Many AD corporate decisions seem irrational and strange to us. Why should this case be any different?
I truly wish everything would go as we wanted. Constant progress and development of Arnold. 2016-04-19 0:20 GMT+02:00 Steven Caron <[email protected]>: > Yes, some aren't excited about paying AD money but that is what I am > saying... AD will need to keep these people happy or they will ditch > Arnold. Breaking Arnold in C4D or Houdini is a lose lose scenario. They > don't sell a Maya license and they don't sell an Arnold license. If we > reduce AD's behaviors to 'corporate greed' like this forum tends to do, > then alienating thousands of users is illogical. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Artur W <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, but as we know a lot of people pay them not very willingly. Matter >> of choice. >> So, conspiracy theory, all they need to do after they plant arnold within >> Maya and/or Max is to just mess SDK a bit. Not as if they haven't already >> on purpose or by accident. >> Vray suddenly having glitches and bugs, the promises of fixes prolong. >> >> Just imagining things, but who knows. >> >> >> > ------ > Softimage Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
