GI-DSLite addresses a concern about overlapping IPv4 addresses within a single operator domain. Hence it is a transition solution that may be applicable in certain deployments with very large subscriber numbers.
I support the WG taking this document as part of its charter. I would also suggest that the WG collaborate with 3GPP on the development of this I-D in terms of requirements and its applicability within the EPS architecture. -Raj >Dear WG, > >At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI DS-lite, and >the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization. There was >similar interest shown during the last IETF meeting and an informal show of >hands demonstrated large support to take GI DS-lite as a working group item. >This of course need to be confirmed on the list, and unless we hear otherwise, >we, Softwires chairs, will work with our ADs to add GI-DS-lite on our charter. > > - Alain, softwires co-chair. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
