Hi Behcet, Please see inline. Regards, Ahmad > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Ahmad Muhanna <ahmad.muha...@ericsson.com> > > To: Alain Durand <adur...@juniper.net> > > Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org> > > Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 9:49:07 AM > > Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > > > Hi Alain, > > Sorry that I was not at the last IETF meeting nor the > > IETF-3GPP meeting and I am some what ignorant of the amount > of support > > this draft received and the arguments that have been used > in these meetings . > > However, declaring the adoption of this draft as a WG document in 5 > > days without specifying a deadline seems to me a little fast! > > On the other hand, > > After reading this draft a couple of times. I failed to > understand the > > value of this solution to MIP6 and PMIP6 as they quite clearly > > referenced in the draft. > > >In other words, since mobility architecture seems to be a major > >beneficiary target for this solution, it is quite important > for us to > >understand what this draft offers and how it fits or > overlay this architecture? > > DS-Lite for mobility has been discussed in our draft: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-softwire-dslitemobility-01.txt > this draft needs to be updated but we were lazy to do so :-). [Ahmad] So, you are saying that nothing new is needed.
> > GI DS-Lite assumes an unmodified core so it works well with > GTP like mobility protocols. There are other things but I > don't know if it is worth discussing them. [Ahmad] Are you saying that this draft proposal is for GTP based mobility solution(s) only? > > Regards, > > --b > > > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
