Hi all, +1
I too support the adoption of this draft as WG document. BR, Mohana > -----Original Message----- > ------ Forwarded Message > From: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:02:50 +0200 > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > I'm in favor of adopting it as WG item. It's a nice piece of work and > fits very well to the deployment scenarios of mobile operators. > > Kind regards > Olaf > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Alain Durand > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > > > Dear WG, > > > > At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI > > DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should take on its > > standardization. There was similar interest shown during the last > > IETF meeting and an informal show of hands demonstrated large > > support to take GI DS-lite as a working group item. > > This of course need to be confirmed on the list, and unless we hear > > otherwise, we, Softwires chairs, will work with our ADs to add > > GI-DS-lite on our charter. > > > > - Alain, softwires co-chair. > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > ------ End of Forwarded Message _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
