Hi folks, just a minor non-technical remark.
We all know that there are lots of mobile operators out there, each with a special network infrastructure and a special IPv6 integration/migration strategy. From that perspective it seems logical that we will never find the global-galatctical all fitting migration mechanism and that we have to standardize and perhaps deploy a toolset of mechanisms. At the end the provider has to choose his poisson. As far as I understood, 3GPP has already a document where it describes what tools they need. GI DS-lite is one of the chosen tools and it fits very well to several operator networks and migration scenarios. That's why I'm, in favor for adopting it as WG document. And to be clear: A WG document still needs work and discussion inside the WG. But sometimes I have the feeling that today very often the requirements for a document to become a WG item are set equal to the requirements for a WG LC. But this may be my personal feeling only. Kind regards Olaf _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
