On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:13 AM, "Alain Durand" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I understand that the exact behavior of a DHCP client receiving a FQDN option is not necessarily covered adequately in DHC documents, but I do not think this is the time now to embark in such an endeavor. This isn't correct. The situation is that the behavior of the client with respect to FQDN options is clearly specified, but is different than what is specified in the current version of the ds-lite draft. So if we are *okay* with the default behavior, it would be preferable to use it instead of specifying this new, different behavior. I think we are on agreement on this one. - Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
