> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of David W. Hankins
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Softwires] draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-06
> 
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:36:32PM +0000, Dave Thaler wrote:
> > It is my understanding that if the string passed to a name resolver
> > library contains dots, no search list should be used.  (Reference: RFC
> > 1535)
> 
> And then there is the unix world of stub resolvers, where the search string is
> used after an initial attempt on any query with one or more dots ("ndots:1" is
> the default configuration).
> 
> And yet it is unlikely that someone is going to name their AFTR endpoint
> 'example.com'.
> 
> Consequences;
> 
> 1) The root receives queries for (and formulates NXDOMAIN responses)
>    'aftr.site'.  The client then moves on to try its search path.  Despite
>    negative cache entries in recursive resolvers, this is littering.
> 
> 2) Windows (no search behavior on any dots) and Unix (behavior I
>    described) becomes incompatible.  The two types of client, given
>    the same aftr-name option contents will process these contents in
>    different ways, either requiring specialized configuration, or
>    defining a standard behavior by fiat or muscle.

Do the following two strings have the same behavior on Windows and Unix:
1) "example"  (search path applied)
2) "example.com." (no search path applied, note trailing dot)
?

If so, then compatibility is straightforward to configure.

-Dave

> 
> So I believe a standard description of the process that both can implement
> equally (with the same consequent behaviors) and does not trouble the root
> nameservers needlessly is in order.
> 
> I think what is essentially a "ndots:2" configuration setting, which I have
> verbosely described, is the correct method.
> 
> --
> David W. Hankins      "If you don't do it right the first time,
> Network Mercenary             you'll just have to do it again."
>                                               -- Jack T. Hankins
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to