On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:17:03PM -0800, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Do I take this to mean that you are not in favor of the use of the
> search path with this option?
That's one workaround. I am neither for nor against it. The search
path behavior was required in the WG discussions that were causative
in the -06 revision of the draft. I am simply reflecting that
discussion and consensus.
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Network Mercenary you'll just have to do it again."
-- Jack T. Hankins
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
