Daniel - can you take these thoughts to v6ops and add them to the discussion of CPE-router-bis?
- Ralph On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Daniel Roesen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:47:50PM -0500, Ralph Droms wrote: >> This behavior should most likely be specified in the cpe-router-bis >> draft. It may interact with other Initialization behaviors, as well. > > I've just noticed that cpe-router-bis already takes a stab at it (I > blame it on my lack of sleep that I missed it before), in chapter 5.6.3. > > What's probably missing there is the bigger picture with implications on > how provisioning models should look like (e.g. make sure that the > DHCPv4/v6 servers involved only return either DS-Lite AFTR in DHCPv6, > or 6RD BR in DHCPv4, but not both at the same time. Also it should > define behaviour in case the options are returned without being asked > for. > > Sorry if I'm a bit "hectic" and didn't do my homework properly before > posting, "making noise" in the wrong places. > > Best regards, > Daniel > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
