Hi, This is a draft submitted to softwires. Why not?
--satoru On 2011/05/10, at 16:55, Jacni Qin wrote: > Re-, > > Just to confirm it, only 4-4 and 6-6 are covered, no 4-6, right? > > > Cheers, > Jacni > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Satoru Matsushima > <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> wrote: > Remi-san has simply pointed out that the service use case section of the > draft assumes same implication in the ds-lite draft. I think that it would be > no problem, and better to just remove the use case section, because the draft > already expressed it as target space table in the introduction. > > Best regards, > --satoru > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
