Dear Ole, For sure, the text can be shortened whenever possible.
If you point me to sections you think it need to be re-worded, this would be appreciated. Thank you. Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : Ole Troan [mailto:ichiroumak...@gmail.com] De la part de Ole Troan Envoyé : jeudi 26 mai 2011 10:36 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP Cc : Rémi Després; Satoru Matsushima; Yiu Lee; Olaf Bonness; Isabel Borges; Softwires-wg Objet : Re: [Softwires] Motivation draft for stateless v4 over v6 solution I like the draft and I think it covers the motivational points well. as a general comment, I do think the document is too wordy. could the authors make the next revision terser or do you want me to propose text changes? I would also suggest that you reference the sections in rfc1958 on state. we don't have a good success record in gleaning state in the middle of the network (NAT, N:1 VLANs, DHCP...), since the protocols we 'glean' from aren't designed to maintain softstate in the network. I see no reason why this document shouldn't be adopted as a working group document immediately. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
