I support that. I am sorry if I get you misunderstood I didn't support Section 5.
On 7/8/11 8:12 AM, "Jim Guichard" <[email protected]> wrote: >I think the other necessary change is for section 5. Could you agree to >change the 1st bullet to allow for dynamic establishment of softwires? It >seems restrictive to mandate that they be pre-established. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
