FYI. I just posted draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-lite-05 reflecting the discussion (including the two requested changes).
Regards, Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: Paco Cortes [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 6:05 AM > To: Lee, Yiu > Cc: Jim Guichard; Frank Brockners (fbrockne); [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Softwires] draft-ietf-softwire-gateway-init-ds-list-02 > > I also support Jim's proposed change to section 5 > > 2011/7/8 Lee, Yiu <[email protected]>: > > I support that. I am sorry if I get you misunderstood I didn't > support > > Section 5. > > > > On 7/8/11 8:12 AM, "Jim Guichard" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>I think the other necessary change is for section 5. Could you agree > to > >>change the 1st bullet to allow for dynamic establishment of > softwires? It > >>seems restrictive to mandate that they be pre-established. > > > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
