I also support Jim's proposed change to section 5

2011/7/8 Lee, Yiu <[email protected]>:
> I support that. I am sorry if I get you misunderstood I didn't support
> Section 5.
>
> On 7/8/11 8:12 AM, "Jim Guichard" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I think the other necessary change is for section 5. Could you agree to
>>change the 1st bullet to allow for dynamic establishment of softwires? It
>>seems restrictive to mandate that they be pre-established.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to