Shishio Thanks for your explaination, just one more comment
Server based solution will expereience bottleneck once the traffic grows up? Regards, -Hui 2011/7/22 Shishio Tsuchiya <[email protected]> > Hui > Thanks for your comment. > > Hui Deng wrote: > > Hello authors, > > > > Just wondering how you handle those issues which were mentioned in the > draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-01 > > for example, > > 1) have you supported Ipv4 any cast? > > I'm not sure what is issue in comcast case yet. > But Sakura is not using IPv4 anycast for 6rd BR now. > > > 2) implemented DHCPv4 options? > We mentioned about this. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-4.2 > The server-based 6rd does not needs automatic configuration because the > server usually configure IPv4 address statically. > > > 3) the number of implementations? > Many OS already supported 6rd feature. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-3 > > > > 4) Data center normally has high end routers and switches, would that > possible to deploy 6rd CE without any influences of performance? you may > deployed it on the server? > > In Sakura's case,switches has high performance for IPv4 switching,but IPv6 > switching poor or not support. > To provide IPv6 internet without any influence of existing service,Sakura > is providing information of server-based 6rd to customers. > > Regards, > -Shishio > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > -Hui > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
