Hui
I appreciate your comment.
Hui Deng wrote:
> Shishio
> Thanks for your explaination, just one more comment
> Server based solution will expereience bottleneck once the traffic grows up?
> Regards,

In current datacenter services,user can select type of service by expected 
traffic.
traffic is small-VPS->Dedicated Server->Housing Service--traffic is huge

In housing service,router based 6rd CE would be fine.
If user would select this architecture,user also can use some native IPv6 
technics such as loadbalancing.

I mensioned on section-2.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-00#section-2
 -For Housing users, there are two options.  Either the 6rd CE
function is performed on the Gateway router itself, or the servers themselves 
can run 6rd directly.

But I felt it need more detail description.
The former is for huge performance request users.
The later is for IPv6 small start users who not needs server load balancer.

Regards,
-Shishio


> -Hui
> 2011/7/22 Shishio Tsuchiya <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
>     Hui
>     Thanks for your comment.
> 
>     Hui Deng wrote:
>      > Hello authors,
>      >
>      > Just wondering how you handle those issues which were mentioned in the 
> draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-01
>      > for example,
>      > 1) have you supported Ipv4 any cast?
> 
>     I'm not sure what is issue in comcast case yet.
>     But Sakura is not using IPv4 anycast for 6rd BR now.
> 
>      > 2) implemented DHCPv4 options?
>     We mentioned about this.
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-4.2
>     The server-based 6rd does not needs automatic configuration because the 
> server usually configure IPv4 address statically.
> 
>      > 3) the number of implementations?
>     Many OS already supported 6rd feature.
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01#section-3
> 
> 
>      > 4) Data center normally has high end routers and switches, would that 
> possible to deploy 6rd CE without any influences of performance? you may 
> deployed it on the server?
> 
>     In Sakura's case,switches has high performance for IPv4 switching,but 
> IPv6 switching poor or not support.
>     To provide IPv6 internet without any influence of existing service,Sakura 
> is providing information of server-based 6rd to customers.
> 
>     Regards,
>     -Shishio
> 
> 
>      >
>      > Best regards,
>      >
>      > -Hui
>      >
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to