Jan, The better solution would be to allocate more ports to the user, depending on ISP policy.
The CPE/home router can log the exhaustion of the binding and this could be notified by SNMP (at least in the managed CPE case). Cheers, Rajiv > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Jan Zorz @ go6.si > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 10:37 AM > To: Satoru Matsushima > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the stateles/stateful discussion > > On 8/1/11 1:07 PM, Satoru Matsushima wrote: > > So my question is that how dynamic is dynamic, and how static is > > static. The analogy of dynamic routing is that dynamic for updating > > routing information for prefixes but forwarding plane is stateless. > > If you imagine dynamic port ranges within stateless, it sounds like > > port range aware routing. I think that it would be controversial. > > yes, kind of. > > Well, is short words, whatever number of ports you assign in > port-set/range, end user can exhaust them. > > You need then give the user additional ports in order to communicate or > decide otherwise and send all additional traffic from this point on to > big evil CGN in the core. > > Any idea how to solve this with 4rd and don't use CGN? > > Cheers, Jan Zorz > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
