Jacni Qin wrote, on 08/01/2011 11:14 PM: > On 8/1/2011 10:45 PM, Simon Perreault wrote: >> Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote, on 08/01/2011 10:36 AM: >>> Well, is short words, whatever number of ports you assign in >>> port-set/range, end >>> user can exhaust them. >> The fact that most ISPs have been successfully operating with 65536 ports per >> subscriber demonstrates that it is possible to statically provision >> subscribers >> with "enough" ports. > Sorry, I don't catch your point here, could you?
The original assertion was "there is no X such that X number of ports per user is enough." Past experience shows that "X=65536 is enough". Therefore, the original assertion is false. :) Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
