Sorry typo: I mean this draft "could" be controversial. On 8/1/11 1:18 PM, "Lee, Yiu" <[email protected]> wrote:
>In this case, >http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-01.txt >couldn't be controversial because it will turn AFTR a PRR. > >On 8/1/11 7:07 AM, "Satoru Matsushima" <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>If you imagine dynamic port ranges within stateless, it sounds like port >>range aware routing. I think that it would be controversial. > >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
