> I guess you mean multiple rules, then it'll be one CE connected to multiple > domains.
Actually, I mean one 4rd domain can accommodate multiple domain ipv6 prefixes. I don't understand why the current draft mandate one 4rd domain has only one domain ipv6 prefix. Thanks, washam > That has been mentioned in the current version but no more elaboration. ;-) > > > Cheers, > Jacni > > On 8/14/2011 8:52 PM, Washam Fan wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems to me only one domain IPv6 prefix is allowed, per > draft-murakami-softwire-4rd- > 00. But I see no issue if we allow > multiple domain IPv6 prefixes. E.g., when a CE tries to encapsulate a > outbound IPv4 package, the matched rule can tell which domain ipv6 > prefix can be used for building outer IPv6 destination address. > > Thanks, > washam > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
