Hi,

2011/8/16 Rémi Després <[email protected]>:
> Hi Tetsuya-san,
>
> I agree, of course, on the need to support several mapping rules.

Is there anywhere in the draft to mention how to deliver these rules?
As my understanding, the provisions described in section 4 only can
generate a mapping rule, how about deliver multiple mapping rules.

> But IMHO one point needs clarification (see below).
>
>
> Le 16 août 2011 à 02:03, Tetsuya Murakami a écrit :
>
>> Hi Washam,
>>
>> We can allow to use multiple mapping rules in a 4rd domain.
> ...
>> When delegating an IPv6 prefix from the network, the corresponding mapping 
>> rule whose domain ipv6 prefix has the longest match with the delegated ipv6 
>> prefix, can be selected.
>
> As already discussed privately, I don't know realistic cases where two rules 
> would have IPv6 or IPv4 overlapping prefixes.
> Consequently, it seems that "longest" match, while being permitted, doesn't 
> need to be a requirement.

Have the same feeling, ipv4 prefixes/addresses/port-set don't overlap,
per my understanding.

Thanks,
washam
> Would you have such use cases to share?
>
> Regards,
> RD
>
>>
>> Also, when forwarding an IPv4 packet to another CE, the corresponding 
>> mapping rule whose domain 4rd prefix has the longest match with the the 
>> destination ipv4 address, can be selected.
>>
>> It is stated in section 5.1.1 and section 7 a little bit in the draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tetsuya Murakami
>>
>> On 2011/08/14, at 5:52, Washam Fan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems to me only one domain IPv6 prefix is allowed, per
>>> draft-murakami-softwire-4rd-00. But I see no issue if we allow
>>> multiple domain IPv6 prefixes. E.g., when a CE tries to encapsulate a
>>> outbound IPv4 package, the matched rule can tell which domain ipv6
>>> prefix can be used for building outer IPv6 destination address.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> washam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Softwires mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to