hi Remi,
On 8/16/2011 4:27 PM, Rémi Després wrote:
...
As already discussed privately, I don't know realistic cases where two rules
would have IPv6 or IPv4 overlapping prefixes.
Consequently, it seems that "longest" match, while being permitted, doesn't
need to be a requirement.
If there are multiple ways for CPE to decide the IPv6 prefix, we have to
specify the order of priority. e.g., firstly check if there is any
implication assigned along with the rules, no? then choose the "longest"
match.
BTW, I think the longest match is not bad.
Cheers,
Jacni
Would you have such use cases to share?
Regards,
RD
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
