Ole Ok.I won't,if this interim will focuses discussion of "new" stateless solution and it is not enough time. > > And if it is possible,please assign faster of time slot. Let's move to lower priority of time slot.
Regards, -Shishio Ole Troan wrote: > isn't this interim there to discuss the new stateless approaches. not to be > overflow meeting for whatever didn't make it on the agenda at the last IETF > meeting? > > if we get time to spare fine, but I would certainly have liked this meeting > to be focused on the "stateless" solutions. and with the number of drafts > published I would think we have enough to fill a couple of days too. > > cheers, > Ole > > > On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:12 , Shishio Tsuchiya wrote: > > > Alain > > I would like to have a presentation our draft. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakura-6rd-datacenter-01 > > I was assigned time slot on IETF81,but I could not... > > This is informative 6rd draft for operators,I think. > > > > Please assign a slot for this. > > And if it is possible,please assign faster of time slot. > > > > Regards, > > -Shishio > > > > Alain Durand wrote: > >> As we mentioned earlier, the softwire interim meeting will focus on > 'stateless solutions'. If you'd like to present there, please send the chairs > a note by Friday this week. > >> > >> Alain. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Softwires mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
