Remi, [...]
>> Furthermore, there is already an approach adopted by the WG for public IPv4 >> address case, > >> if the MAP just covers "shared address with one single sharing ratio for one >> domain", >> the design will be greatly simplified? > > Requiring ISPs to maintain IPv4 routing in their networks, just to serve the > few users that need to keep IPv4 prefixes, seems to me a step backward. can you clarify why this? I don't understand why IPv4 routing has to be maintained just because there is a MAP domain with full IPv4 addresses (or a rule for full IPv4 addresses)? cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
