Hi Ole, Technically, I think it now comes down to one question to debate between MAP-T and 4rd-u. Btw reservable header and double-translation, what technology better serves the requirements. Do you agree?
Thanks, Yiu On 3/23/12 5:28 AM, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Remi, who was also at that meeting, later came up with a different >solution and new features and decided to create a competing proposal. MAP >is largely original 4rd and dIVI, considering its roots. there has been a >continuing exchange of ideas and improvement of the proposals. Remi's >latest 4rd-U proposal largely represents all the functions that there was >no support for in the MAP design team. I do not think attempting yet >another merger will be a good use of our time. >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
