Hi Guanghui, Is the original use case for MAP is to deliver v4 over v6 in a stateless fashion in the network? This is stated in the stateless-requirements draft. If we can get v4-v6 (single translation) for free, I am all for it. But this isn't the original requirements we are trying to solve. Right?
Thanks, Yiu From: Guanghui Yu <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:43:07 +0800 To: "Yiu L. LEE" <[email protected]> Cc: Softwires WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rdŠ 4rd-U cannot replace MAP-T, since it cannot support single translation.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
