Hi Guanghui,

I agree that both MAP and 4rd-u are similar technology and solving the same
problem. From technical perspective, can you elaborate this a lithe bit?

Thanks,
Yiu

From:  Guanghui Yu <[email protected]>
Date:  Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:26:40 +0800
To:  Softwires WG <[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rdŠ

I read 4rd-u draft and found it is flawed.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to