Re-,
Thanks Jiang Dong, for your comments, I'll discuss with the authors
about it.

Cheers,
Jacni

On 4/18/2012 Wednesday 11:08 AM, Jiang Dong wrote:
> HiShishio,
> It seems the definition of 6rd MIB is more acceptable than the
> extension of IP tunnel MIB according to the Softwire meeting in Paris.
> Since the 6rd MIB draft itself is quite clear, a clarification of
> using one specific way would be helpful : )
> Regards!
> Jiang Dong
> 2012-04-18
> *From:* Shishio Tsuchiya <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Date:* 2012-03-26 22:19
> *To:* jiangdong345 <mailto:[email protected]>
> *CC:* cai.lei3 <mailto:[email protected]>; jacni
> <mailto:[email protected]>; softwires <mailto:[email protected]>;
> cuiyong <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Softwires]Comments about 6rd MIB
> Jiang
> Thanks for comments.
> I will do presentation this draft at Friday,and I will ask which idea
> is better to the audience and chairs.
> If IP tunnel MIB extended is better than 6rdMIB,so we would update and
> define extension of IP tunnel MIB.
> 6rd MIB is completely reflecting to 6rd configuration.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5969#section-7
> "sixRdIpv4MaskLen " is same function as IPv4MaskLen.
> IPv4MaskLen The number of high-order bits that are identical
> across all CE IPv4 addresses within a given 6rd
> domain. For example, if there are no identical
> bits, IPv4MaskLen is 0 and the entire CE IPv4
> address is used to create the 6rd delegated
> prefix. If there are 8 identical bits (e.g., the
> Private IPv4 address range 10.0.0.0/8 is being
> used), IPv4MaskLen is equal to 8 and IPv4MaskLen
> high-order bits are stripped from the IPv4
> address before constructing the corresponding 6rd
> delegated prefix.
> Regards,
> -Shishio
> (2012/03/26 15:59), Jiang Dong wrote:
> > Hi,authors of 6rd MIB,
> > I get some comments about 6rd MIB draft.
> > 1) You mentioned the "tunnelIfXTable" in section 5.2. I think it is
> a good idea to extend the tunnel MIB, some scenario cannot be included
> in RFC4087, such as point to multi-point tunnel like softwire mesh.
> > 2) It seems you miss the conformance part in the definition.
> > 3) I'm not quite sure what's the "sixRdIpv4MaskLen " used for, can
> you explain it?
> > Regards!
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 --
> > Jiang Dong
> > Tsinghua University
> >
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to