1. Rajiv Asati, Cisco: Yes 2. Rajiv Asati, Cisco: MAP Cheers, Rajiv
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Alain Durand > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:14 PM > To: [email protected] WG > Cc: [email protected]; Softwire Chairs > Subject: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP > > Dear Softwire wg members: > > At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a > whole) and > 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one > solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make this > decision relatively quickly. > > During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: > Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? > We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. > > The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like > to ask the same questions to the list. > > ================================================================ > ===== > Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a > whole) on the standard track, > the other being published as experimental or informational. > Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as > standard track. > Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the > standard track. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- > > > ================================================================ > ===== > > Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: > 4rd-U or MAP? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > > ================================================================ > ===== > > > > > Please fill out the following form and reply to the list > by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT. > > Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to > one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads. > That would help up gauge consensus. > > Alain & Yong. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
