> ===================================================================== > Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, > the other being published as experimental or informational. > Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. > Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raghu, IPInfusion, YES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ===================================================================== > > Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: > 4rd-U or MAP? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raghu, IPInfusion, MAP >======================================================================== Thanks Raghu >> >>> Dear Softwire wg members: >>> >>> At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a whole) and >>> 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one >>> solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make this >>> decision relatively quickly. >>> >>> During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: >>> Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? >>> We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. >>> >>> The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like >>> to ask the same questions to the list. >>> >> >> (*) >>> ===================================================================== >>> Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, >>> the other being published as experimental or informational. >>> Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. >>> Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. >> >> >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- >>> Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- >>> >>> >>> ===================================================================== >>> >>> Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: >>> 4rd-U or MAP? >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ >>> Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ >>> >>> ===================================================================== >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please fill out the following form and reply to the list >>> by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT. >>> >>> Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to >>> one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads. >>> That would help up gauge consensus. >>> >>> Alain & Yong. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Softwires mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
