-----Original Message----- Dear Softwire wg members: At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a whole) and 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make this decision relatively quickly.
During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like to ask the same questions to the list. ===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Arkadiusz Kaliwoda, Cisco, YES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Arkadiusz Kaliwoda, Cisco, MAP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
