On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Rémi Després wrote: > > Absence of clear consensus was clear in Paris. > Mailing list is AFAIK appropriate to confirm a consensus, not to quickly mask > a lack of consensus by means of a weird voting procedure.
Remi, You are correct there was a clear lack of consensus in the Paris meeting. However, the gauge to enable us to formally declare consensus (or lack thereof) is not the meeting, but the mailing list. Thus, we are asking the very same questions we asked during the Paris meeting on the mailing list. This is NOT a formal vote. This is just a way for us, chairs, to confirm the consensus (or lack thereof) we saw in Paris. If the situation on the mailing remains the same as it was in Paris, we will then decide what the next appropriate steps are. - Alain, wg co-chair. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
