Le 2012-04-05 à 19:20, Alain Durand a écrit : > > On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Rémi Després wrote: >> >> Now, one question, assuming for a second that the new procedure would >> confirms what we had in the face-to-face meeting, yes to Q1, no consensus >> to Q2, what is your current plan? >> >> RD > > There are a number of possibilities, but I do not want to go into the details > before we see the results of the current consensus call.
So: 1. There an attempt at negating the clear absence of consensus in Paris (this BTW despite 45 min to present MAP and only 15 min to present 4rd-U). 2. The WG cannot be informed of what happens if the this lack of consensus is maintained. Sorry, but I must disagree that his is normal process in IETF. RD > > Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
