Hi Yiu,

Works for me. Thanks.

Cheers,
Med 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Lee, Yiu [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Envoyé : lundi 11 juin 2012 16:54
>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; liu dapeng
>Cc : [email protected]; Yong Cui
>Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on 
>draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-01
>
>Hi Med and Dapeng,
>
>In order to close the gap, I suggest a slight modification:
>
>"Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4
>   service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that
>sharing of global IPv4 addresses between
>Customers is based upon the deployment of NAT (Network Address
>   Translation) capabilities in the network.  Because of some 
>caveats of
>   such stateful approaches the Service Provider community feels that a
>   companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6
>   approaches.  Note that the stateless solution elaborated in this
>document
>focuses on the carrier-side stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solution. 
>States may
>still exist in other equipments such as customer-premises equipment."
>
>Thanks,
>Yiu
>
>
>On 6/8/12 8:12 AM, "[email protected]"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Med: Thanks for the proposal. I shortened your proposal and 
>updated the
>>text to:
>>
>>
>>   Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4
>>   service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that
>>   assume the sharing of any global IPv4 address that is left between
>>   several customers, based upon the deployment of NAT 
>(Network Address
>>   Translation) capabilities in the network.  Because of some 
>caveats of
>>   such stateful approaches the Service Provider community 
>feels that a
>>   companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6
>>   approaches.  Note stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solutions may be enabled
>>   in conjunction with a port-restricted NAT44 function located in the
>>   customer premises.
>>
>>   This document provides elaboration on the need for carrier-side
>>   stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solution.
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to