2012-06-25 à 16:24, Wojciech Dec: ... > The updated MAP draft does not change the MAP architecture nor its technical > underpinnings. In fact there are no changes, bar editorial to the normative > parts of MAP,
Having asked several times for a list of substantial evolutions from previous MAP drafts, with their justifications, and having received no answer, I see this statement as an indirect but first answer. But it doesn't seem acceptable (*): - AFAIK, the added 5th parameter of basic mapping rules is more than editorial - I didn't find the equivalent of the following sentence in previous drafts: "A MAP-E CE provisioned with only a Default Mapping Rule, as in the 1:1 case, and with no IPv4 address and port range configured by other means, MUST disable its NAT44 functionality." => A carefully studied list of substantial changes MAP supporters have found appropriate after the Paris meeting remains to be due. > something that is proven by existing implementations prior to this draft > supporting the current draft. Please understand that your stating that some tests (for which we don't have detailed reports) should be considered a proof that what you say is true, is difficult to accept. Especially if what you say seems contradicted by a verifiable fact (see (*) above). RD _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
