+1 for draft-ietf-softwire-map-00

Best Regards,
Leaf


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Simon Perreault
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Softwires] MAP design team [Was: Re: [Softwire] 
draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG]

On 2012-06-26 04:50, Wojciech Dec wrote:
>     - A parameter PER DOMAIN was an obvious result of a merger.
>     - But a parameter PER RULE is a significant novelty.
>     OK?
>
> That was not intended, and appears to be a genuine mistake in draft-00.
> Thanks for spotting.
> It is a parameter per domain, as discussed on the design team alias.

Now that MAP is a softwires WG item, wouldn't it be best for all to move 
MAP discussions to the softwires mailing list?

Thanks,
Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to