On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Rémi Després <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Behcet, > > In the abstract, "customers" is intended to mean customers *of operators* > (CPEs, not end-user hosts). > This can be clarified by, for example, replacing "customers" by "customer > sites". > Agreed?
Agreed :-). That resolves my concern. My comment applies to MAP as well if the same support I mentioned exists there, I need to check it. Regards, Behcet > > Thanks, > RD > > > Le 2012-07-11 à 21:41, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit : > >> Hi Remi, >> >> I was reading this draft and one sentence in the abstract drew my attention: >> >> To cope with the IPv4 address shortage, customers can be >> assigned IPv4 addresses with restricted port sets. >> >> I think this means A+P at the customer level. >> >> I was under the impression that A+P use in 4rd was restricted to the CE >> level. >> >> As you know A+P has limitations, i.e. it can not be used on shared >> links such as 802.3 or 802.11. >> I am not sure if it is mentioned in the draft. >> >> I thought this feature was not in draft-despres-softwire-4rd-00 at >> least the above sentence is not in the abstract. >> >> Have you attended 2009 BoF on A+P? >> There the message was clear: do not use A+P at the customer level. >> >> What is the point of bringing it back? 4rd does it or does it not >> already help in IPv4 address shortage? >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
