On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Rémi Després <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Behcet,
>
> In the abstract, "customers" is intended to mean customers *of operators* 
> (CPEs, not end-user hosts).
> This can be clarified by, for example, replacing "customers" by "customer 
> sites".
> Agreed?

Agreed :-).

That resolves my concern.
My comment applies to MAP as well if the same support I mentioned
exists there, I need to check it.

Regards,

Behcet

>
> Thanks,
> RD
>
>
> Le 2012-07-11 à 21:41, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
>
>> Hi Remi,
>>
>> I was reading this draft and one sentence in the abstract drew my attention:
>>
>> To cope with the IPv4 address shortage, customers can be
>>   assigned IPv4 addresses with restricted port sets.
>>
>> I think this means A+P at the customer level.
>>
>> I was under the impression that A+P use in 4rd was restricted to the CE 
>> level.
>>
>> As you know A+P has limitations, i.e. it can not be used on shared
>> links such as 802.3 or 802.11.
>> I am not sure if it is mentioned in the draft.
>>
>> I thought this feature was not in draft-despres-softwire-4rd-00 at
>> least the above sentence is not in the abstract.
>>
>> Have you attended 2009 BoF on A+P?
>> There the message was clear: do not use A+P at the customer level.
>>
>> What is the point of bringing it back? 4rd does it or does it not
>> already help in IPv4 address shortage?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to