Hi Behcet, About the statement of "do not use A+P at the customer level", could you provide some background information, For example list the reasons?
BTW, for the record, what does "customer" mean exactly here? Is home gateway also a customer-level terminology, or you only mean do not apply A+P to IPv6-connected host? Thanks a lot. On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Remi, > > I was reading this draft and one sentence in the abstract drew my attention: > > To cope with the IPv4 address shortage, customers can be > assigned IPv4 addresses with restricted port sets. > > I think this means A+P at the customer level. > > I was under the impression that A+P use in 4rd was restricted to the CE level. > > As you know A+P has limitations, i.e. it can not be used on shared > links such as 802.3 or 802.11. > I am not sure if it is mentioned in the draft. > > I thought this feature was not in draft-despres-softwire-4rd-00 at > least the above sentence is not in the abstract. > > Have you attended 2009 BoF on A+P? > There the message was clear: do not use A+P at the customer level. > > What is the point of bringing it back? 4rd does it or does it not > already help in IPv4 address shortage? > > Regards, > > Behcet > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
