Dear Edwin, Thank you for sharing the experiment results.
I saw you made tests for torrent applications. FWIW, we had done an extensive testing of this application. The results of these testing are valid for all address sharing variants (including A+P): http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-pcp-bittorrent-00. This I-D provides an explanation for the failure you observed. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de [email protected] >Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2012 20:46 >À : [email protected] >Objet : Re: [Softwires] Way forward with MAP-T and 4rd > >Hello Suresh and all, > >Regardind MAP-T we, at NIC.br, made some tests to verify the user >experience on a network using MAP-T. > >We published a draft with the results >(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cordeiro-softwire-experience-ma >pt-00.txt). > >Any comments are welcome. > >Best Regards, > >Edwin Cordeiro >NIC.br > >Quoting "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]>: > >> Hi all, >> One of the followup questions we had after choosing the standards >> track solution was to see what the wg wanted to do with the other two >> solutions (MAP-T and 4rd). The sense of the room was that >the wg was in >> favor of not abandoning them. We have not verified this >formally in the >> ML and we have not worked out the exact logistics of how we will go >> about pursuing the other solutions. The chairs will get this process >> started by the end of this week with a set of questions to the wg. >> >> Thanks >> Suresh & Yong >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
