I am no the author of two drafts,

It should be more convinced that there is a scenario and PS about the
motivation of the work.

Thanks autho for publishing it quite recently, that would be more
appropriate to discuss them during the coming IETF meeting before accept
them.
Otherwise IETF is going to invent the 2nd wheel for the same problem.

thanks a lot

-Hui

2012/9/25 Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>   During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to
> determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the
> sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed
> standard stateless solution. There was also general agreement in the
> room to continue working on MAP-T and 4rd as experimental/informational
> specifications. After the meeting, there has also been some uncertainty
> as to the order in which the different drafts would progress from the wg,
>
> This call is being initiated to confirm two things:
>
> a) whether there is WG consensus towards continuing working on MAP-T and
> 4rd as experimental documents.
> b) whether there is WG consensus that MAP-E should be progressed to
> working group last call & IESG review before MAP-T and 4rd.**
>
> Please state whether or not you're in favor of each of these decisions
> by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also
> (re)state your objections in your response.
>
> The call will complete at midnight EDT on 2012-10-05.
>
> Regards
> Suresh & Yong
>
> * Questions are available at
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf
>
> ** Note that work on MAP-T and 4rd can proceed in parallel with MAP-E
> and we are not aiming to freeze work on these drafts. They just will not
> be progressed from the WG before MAP-E is progressed. This is to ensure
> that the drafts do not end up competing for the available (finite)
> review cycles.
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to