Hi, Suresh, - Confirmed support for a) - Agreement to b), with a caveat: . Permitting WG last call for either or both of 4rd and MAP-T as soon as ready would have been preferred. (Stabilizing asap an experimental specification is useful to ensure compatibility of experiments.) . This can hopefully be done WITHIN the WG, even if not progressed "from the WG" yet.
Best regards, RD 2012-09-25 06:45, Suresh Krishnan : > Hi all, > During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to > determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the > sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed > standard stateless solution. There was also general agreement in the > room to continue working on MAP-T and 4rd as experimental/informational > specifications. After the meeting, there has also been some uncertainty > as to the order in which the different drafts would progress from the wg, > > This call is being initiated to confirm two things: > > a) whether there is WG consensus towards continuing working on MAP-T and > 4rd as experimental documents. > b) whether there is WG consensus that MAP-E should be progressed to > working group last call & IESG review before MAP-T and 4rd.** > > Please state whether or not you're in favor of each of these decisions > by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also > (re)state your objections in your response. > > The call will complete at midnight EDT on 2012-10-05. > > Regards > Suresh & Yong > > * Questions are available at > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf > > ** Note that work on MAP-T and 4rd can proceed in parallel with MAP-E > and we are not aiming to freeze work on these drafts. They just will not > be progressed from the WG before MAP-E is progressed. This is to ensure > that the drafts do not end up competing for the available (finite) > review cycles. Stabilizing an experimental specification WITHIN the WG remains useful to ensure compatibility of experiments in progress, even if not yet progressed FROM the WG. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
