Yiu, >> From my perspective, the argument is not whether two protocols are > identical or not. I found MAP-E 1:1 is a stateful solution. I found it odd > to make it part of MAP-E which was originally decided a stateless solution.
look at it as a slider. just like you can represent both aggregate routes (/20, /24) and host routes (/32) in a RIB, so you can in MAP. you can make a data structure that only support host routes (LW46), but when you have a data structure that supports variable prefix lengths then host route support is part of the package. I don't think there is a way to take 1:1 mode out of MAP, even if we wanted to. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
