> [Yuchi] Actually there is a 'binding' table on the AFTR, which maintains > matching between v4 A+P and v6 A, and there's no 'mapping with address and > port' in DS-Lite or Lw4over6 as in MAP. The main point here is not about the > literal difference between 'binding' and 'mapping', but the difference > between decoupling v4 & v6 and coupling v4 & v6.
let us assume we have a 1.1.1.0/24 for address sharing available with 256 ports per user. in MAP 1:1 you'd have: 1.1.1.1:01/40 -> 2001:db8::1 1.1.1.1:02/40 -> 2001:db8::2 1.1.1.1:03/40 -> 2001:db8::3 . . . 64K rules. in MAP aggregated mode you have: 1.1.1.0/24 -> 2001:db8:XXXX::/48 can you please show how the LW46 rules / binding /mapping whatever you call them look like for 1:1 mode? cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
