Hi, I couldn't make comment during meeting but, On 2013/03/12, at 3:28, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote:
> - Offset 4 versus 6. > Discussion on value of wasting 3000 port versus simplicity of nibble > alignment. > No objection to moving default offset to 6 (from 4 in revision 04) Does anyone have a evaluated result of NAT performance difference in the number of derived port range? ie. 63 port ranges (6 bits offset) vs 15 port ranges (4 bit offset) on a CPE. It would be better to see the result which show it could be negligible with the updated text. cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
