Tom I misunderstood original question. - Offset 4 versus 6. Discussion on value of wasting 3000 port versus simplicity of nibble alignment. No objection to moving default offset to 6 (from 4 in revision 04)
I think,this is NOT impact for user experience and implementations. Regards, -Shishio (2013/03/18 9:03), Tom Taylor wrote: > I would think the number of blocks through which the ports are scattered has > very little relevance to the user experience. Surely the key factor is the > sharing ratio? > > Tom Taylor > > On 17/03/2013 5:12 AM, Shishio Tsuchiya wrote: >> I know 3 Geeks who lived in IPv4 15 port and IPv6 internet environment. >> They reported it was comfortable for home network. >> >> And JANOG tested 15port of MAP-E. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-janog-softwire-report-01#section-4.9 >> MAP-E provides IPv6 to CPE,so CPE can use DNS resolver proxy. >> >> There is no performance impact,if they supported DNS proxy. >> >> Regards, >> -Shishio >> > ... > . > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
