Satoru Matsushima 写道:
As each implementation has its own, but I heard at least two implementors
confirm that it is negligible difference between 15 to 63, done.
there is no performance impact for cernet's map cpe. xing
cheers,
--satoru
On 2013/03/13, at 17:39, Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, I couldn't make comment during meeting but,
On 2013/03/12, at 3:28, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote:
- Offset 4 versus 6.
Discussion on value of wasting 3000 port versus simplicity of nibble alignment.
No objection to moving default offset to 6 (from 4 in revision 04)
Does anyone have a evaluated result of NAT performance difference in the number of derived port range?
ie. 63 port ranges (6 bits offset) vs 15 port ranges (4 bit offset) on a CPE.
It would be better to see the result which show it could be negligible with the
updated text.
cheers,
--satoru
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
