Hi Tom,

Good catch. We also caught this last week and started formulating the
revised text.

We may strive to rewrite this section a bit, time permitting.

> Question: does the second sentence say anything different from the first
> one?

Not really. :) 

> Question: if the MAP node is configured differently, how will other
> nodes be able to synthesize its MAP IPv6 address from the FMR?

You mean, BMR !


Cheers,
Rajiv

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Taylor <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 5:20 PM
To: Softwires-wg list <[email protected]>
Subject: [Softwires] MAP-E question -- first prefix

>In Section 5.2 of -map-05, there is the paragraph:
>
>The MAP subnet ID is defined to be the first subnet (all bits set to
>    zero).  Unless configured differently, a MAP node MUST reserve the
>    first IPv6 prefix in an End-user IPv6 prefix for the purpose of MAP.
>
>Question: does the second sentence say anything different from the first
>one?
>
>Question: if the MAP node is configured differently, how will other
>nodes be able to synthesize its MAP IPv6 address from the FMR?
>
>Tom Taylor
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to