I'm happy to propose more text, but if that hook is going to be there, I
think it should be shown explicitly as an optional part of what is
provisioned for a MAP rule.
On 10/04/2013 9:22 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
Tom,
Looks like we had a misunderstanding. Did the authors think of the configured
subnetwork identifier of the existing text as being configured for a particular
rule, in effect another rule parameter? I took it to be configured as a single
value used in conjunction with all FMRs to calculate the target MAP IPv6
addresses.
apologies, I think I confused myself as well.
if we were to support a configurable subnet-id, it would have to be a per
BMR/FMR property.
the base document really just leaves the 'hook' for a provisioning mechanism to
use.
cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
